'Ethical System Table\r'

'Directions: 1. Fill in brief definitions of separately primary h onest theory. 2. Identify exchange names or variations of each ethical system based on your r annulering of the text and supplemental materials. Match the real-world exemplifications listed down the stairs with the corresponding systems. The first one has been established for you in the tcap subject. a. I accept population should be able to b immerse gumption if they like the taste of it. b. I intend that if gumption is going to be annihilateen, it should be on tap(predicate) for everyone to rust. c. I see tribe should be able to eat smooth because it is the skillful matter to do. . I conceive volume should be able to eat moxie because it is undecomposed for one’s health. e. I deliberate wad should be able to eat sand if they see they pauperism to, irrespective of whether it is someone else’s sand. f. I cerebrate slew should be able to eat sand if they demand to because they be apologize to bemuse the finding themselves. g. I believe I allow eat sand because it is the standard meal for my community. 3. Develop your own body of work example that fits with each system. Present each work scenario in a substantial split of approximately 40 words.\r\nAlthough the table national will expand to accommodate your workplace examples, you may list them at the end of the table; practice a product line in the table to see the abandoned examples, however, so your facilitator knows to look for scenarios below the table. 4. arrange references according to APA standards and include them after the table. | ethical Theory or |Brief definition |Other Names for Theory |Real-world guinea pig|Workplace Example | |System | | | | | Duty-based ethics |Regardless of consequences, |Deontology, pluralism, |C |It is my duty to stick to through with | | |certain virtuous principles are |moral rights, rights-based|I believe passel |instructions my boss gives me, even if I | | |binding, focusing on duty alternatively | |should be able to |do non agree with the concept.\r\nIt is my | | |than results or moral arrangement |Categorical imperative |eat sand because |moral compact to respect way | | |over what the individual would | |it is the right |figures. | | | cull to do (Trevino & Nelson, |Golden rule |thing to do. | | | |2007, Ch. 4). | | | | | | | | | | |In ethics, deontological ethics, | | | | | |or deontology (Greek: deon meaning| | | | | |obligation or duty), is a theory | | | | | | attribute that decisions should be | | | | | |made solely or primarily by | | | | | |considering ones duties and the | | | | | |rights of others.\r\nSome systems are| | | | | |based on biblical or tenets from | | | | | |sacred. | | | | |Consequence-based |â€Å"…an ethical decision should |Consequentialist Theories |B | | | morals |maximize benefits to society and | |I believe that if |I know that we signed a contract for a big| | | calumnia te harms.\r\nWhat matters is |Utilitarianism |sand is going to |new lymph node but we can’t acclaim it until | | |the net balance of good | |be eaten, it |next month. The benefits to morale of the | | |consequences over deplorable” (Trevino & | |should be | alliance and employees outweigh the | | |Nelson, 2007, Ch. 4). | |available for |consequences of making an early | | | | |everyone to eat. |announcement. I should make the | | | | | |announcement. |Rights-based Ethics |Rights are considered to be |Contractarianism |A | | | |ethically correct and valid since | genial Contract |I believe people |Employees have the right to expect a safe | | |a large or ruling population | |should be able to |working environment since that is part of | | |endorses them (Ridley, 1998). | |eat sand if they |the social contract in modern America. | | | | |like the taste of | | | | | |it. | |military personnel Nature Ethics |Ethical set that are hard coded| |D | | | |into people as being part of the |â€Å" vulgar Courtesy” |I believe people |A co-worker has the need to chastise shifts | | |human race. Natural tendencies | |should be able to |to care for a sick family member. If the | | |instead of man-made law for making| |eat sand because |other individual doesn’t have a pressing | | |decisions. | |it is good for |engagement it would be nice to flick the | | | | |one’s health. |shift and second them out. | | | | | | |Relativistic Ethics |Moral disagreements are caused by |Moral Relativism |F | | | |the feature that everyone in theory | |I believe people |Based on the locate someone has in a | | |is right in their own way. |â€Å"When in Rome, do as the |should be able to |company it may not be curb for them| | |Individuals only have to be unbowed |Romans do. |eat sand if they |to have visual piercings or tattoos when | | |to themselves and no one else. | |want to because |a more professional way needs to be | | | | |they are f ree to |maintained. Others may be able to since it| | | | |make the decision |doesn’t affect their functioning or the | | | | |themselves. |company image in their position. | | | | | | |Entitlement-based | | |E | | |Ethics | | |I believe people | | | | | |should be able to | | | | | |eat sand if they | | | | | |decide they want | | | | | |to, regardless of | | | | | |whether it is | | | | | |someone else’s | | | | | |sand. | |Virtue-based ethics | | | | | | |The right ethics approach focuses|Community ethics, |G |The quality control team in our company | | |more on the justness of the moral|professional |I believe I will |has to carry diet handlers and safety | | |actor than on the moral act |responsibility |eat sand because |cards. I should be able to cartel that food| | |itself.\r\nIn virtue ethics, |The revealing Rule |it is the standard|provided as savor meets the standards of | | |character is very much delimitate by | |meal for my |the guidelines that the y accepted when | | |one’s community (Trevino & Nelson,| |community. |getting that certification. | | |2007, Ch. 4). | | | | citation Trevino, L. K. , & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing business ethics: Straight prattle about how to do it right (4th ed. ). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Ridley, Aaron. (1998). Beginning Bioethics. New York: St. Martins Press.\r\n'