Critically examine Essay

The four items from the book all say that women overhear the majority of the expectation to do much of the domestic chores. These tasks include much(prenominal) things like caring for the children emotionally, washing clothes and making sure the hu adult malese is tidy etc. The man is seen to be the main breadwinner and has little to do with such domestic tasks. There be views that say, however, that men argon acquire more actively involved, for example item D from M. Denscombe says that The amount of judgment of conviction fathers put across with their children has increased fourfold over a generation amid 1961 and 1995. But it is very hard to do explore within a family unit unless you atomic number 18 in the unit already and can research from within. Item B from M. Jones suggests that the domestic naval division of labour is not in proportion to the division of employed work, even though there is inference to suggest that this is some beats the case, generally st udies indicate that inequality rather than correspondence is the defining characteristic of the majority of present day marriages. There argon many different sociologists that believe that the division of labour in the ingleside is getting more equal in the present day.Item A involved a huge survey of 543 parents and found that workings acquires spend more clip on signalwork than on their full time job. It says that receives in full time employment spend 56 hours on housework compared to mens 31 hours a week. This shows that even when the flummox is working there is still the expectation for her to be the main carer and house worker this sort of division of labour, which is expected, is called the dual burden. Item C is from M.Leonard and suggests that women absorb the voice of the house wife because they want to be seen as a good wife and mother. For this reason they are more likely to accept an unequal division of labour. Willmott and Young (1973) introduced the idea of proportionality, which basically meant that the roles of the married man and wife were equal and balanced. They still arrestd that women would take the main responsibility for the child care and domestic tasks, but said that men were spending about the identical amount of time as the women in the lieu doing home-related activities.The idea of symmetry meant that the domestic tasks would be constituentd out equally, but this would not be stringently true as men were still seen to do the practical jobs such as do it yourself tasks or decorating, while the women would wash up. This meant that they did about the comparable amount of time on domestic tasks, but they were not shared completely equally. This symmetrical division of labour made the relationship more home-centred and they would spend more of the leisure time together, providing a stronger relationship.Willmott and Young would defend that the domestic tasks film become more equal between the economise and wife. T his sort of marriage is called the egalitarian marriage where the tasks are more joint. Burghes would contain with Willmott and Young who say that fathers are more active in childcare these days than they were in the 1960s. Benston, a Marxist-feminist argues that women are used as hold in army of labour and that the work that they do and the way they work benefits the capitalist ashes because they are easily employable and can be let off work easier than men.The capitalist system promotes the traditional nuclear family where the man is the breadwinner and the wife is the carer and looks after the house this is because of the capitalist system that treats women as slaves, women are the slaves of wage slaves Rosser and Harris agree with Wilmot and Youngs theory and say that today the husband is expected to help with the household chores, to stay at home or go out for the evening with his wife, to help with the children, to push the pram, to share the major family decisions.The ca se studies of young married couples confirmed this marked careen in the conjugal relationship and the marked contrast within the new-made past. This is a big change from years past as the husband is getting more involved with the children and helping out more within the home. Elizabeth Bott argues that the conjugal roles in the home are both segregated and joint. This marrow that the jobs round the house are shared in terms of time doing them, but they are segregated because the wife would do different tasks to the man.The man would do such jobs like looking after the car and getting things fixed around the house, while the woman would do jobs which are associated with the mother figure, these are such tasks as making sure there is a dinner on the table and looking after the children while they are playing. Bott in like manner argues that the norms and beliefs of the middle class would ultimately filter down into the working class. At the moment the middle class has a different system when it comes to domestic division of labour, they tend to have the joint domestic task system, where as the working class have a segregated division of labour.By saying that this will filter down means that eventually the working class will change their division of labour so that the tasks between the husband and wife are joint. In conclusion I think that the roles within the family are being a lot more shared, so are becoming more symmetrical. The husband and wife are beginning to share their domestic tasks and this will bring them closer to to each one other, this point agrees with that of Willmott and Young when they say that more of the leisure time that they have will be spent together in the home.I also agree with the view from Beck who says that fathers need an identity, which in this modern world is not letd by their work anymore so they look to other places to provide it. More and more fathers are taking an active role in the development of their children, which provides them with the identity, which they need. The involvement should not be exaggerated though because compared to the mother they still dont play a huge role in the care of the children. This view agrees with Item D, which is the Item that I agree with most as it describes the change of involvement of fathers with their children form the 1960s to the 1990s.