Police History Essay Example for Free

Police History EssayStarting In 1829, Sir Robert Peel began developing his theory of policing. These nine principles argon as relevant today as they were in the 1800s. Peel established the Metropolitan Police when he served as Home Secretary of England. Since Sir Robert Peel introduced his principles of policing in the early 1800s, our country has continued to follow his ideas of effective policing. Community policing is based on Peels concept of prevention. jibe to one of Peels principals, the real key for policing is The practice of law argon the citizenry and the people are the police. Peel conceived that prevention of crime could be accomplished without intruding into the lives of citizens. Sir Robert Peels number 1 principle was that, The basic electric charge for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder (Westminster Police Department, 2012) In our diverse society, it is necessary for police to understand the different cultures that make up the communit ies that they patrol.If police tidy sum relate to and understand the different cultures of the community, they go forth be able to successfully gain public approval. I mean this is important for his second cardinal principals. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police bring throughs. Also, Police must fix the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and hold back the respect of the public. (Westminster Police Department, 2012) Peel also snarl strongly about the idea of the subroutine of hurl as well.In two other principals Peel stated The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical upshot and that Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order lone(prenominal) when the arrange of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficie nt. (Westminster Police Department, 2012) Excessive force has been a public concern and the first sign of community mistrust in the police. It can take years to gain the trust of a community and one incident to lose that trust.By providing adequate training on the use of force and having the publics trust and respect can ensure that force is only used to the extent necessary. When individuals give way shrimpy or no respect towards the police, they are most likely to ignore the requests or demands of officers. This can draw to the officer having to use force in order to gain control of a situation. Peel felt that The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it. (Westminster Police Department, 2012) When police are faced with dispersing large crowds, it is necessary for the public to agree the respect to follow police orders.When individuals lack trust and respect for the police, riots may occur, whi ch can also backsheesh to arrests, serious injuries, and even death. Sir Robert Peels principles and Community Policing go hand in hand and share the same concepts and goals in policing. One of the distinct kindredities mingled with Peels approach and Community Policing is that prevention of crimes is the number one priority. I retrieve that Peel felt morals played an important role in effective policing.It is important that police officers think things through and have the best interests in mind before making decisions. Peels principals Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public assent but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law, and Police should always run their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary (Westminster Police Department, 2012) Are important and should be demonstrated to earn the trust of the people in the long run and to uphold the law. The relationship between the U. S. overnment and police organizations across the United States can be analyzed in several ways.I believe that because the police organizations and the government have a close relationship in several ways. Not only are police organizations expected to follow rules from their own departments, they also must follow standard federal guidelines as well. There are federal, state and, local levels of police organizations. The federal government roles are similar to that of local and state however in that respect are a few differences. The FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and the Department of country of origin Security are utilisations.Employees of these organizations are by law, allowed to make an arrest in any county or state. unalike local or state police organizations, these officers do not provide basic protection service or simple criminal investigations unless the local or state agency cannot control the situation (say for casing a serial killer). There are some pr oblems with the way our government controls certain things with the other agencies. For example our government ran U. S. military is being used for domestic law enforcement. Also, the federal government is taking over the training, financing and delegation of local police.This could cause numerous issues, removing the police from local control may not be the smartest move. The concern is arising that the federalized police have increasingly turned to violent tactics and assaults on people who have not committed any crimes. When issues like this arise, it can cause problems within local or state organizations when it comes to police procedures and the way policing is being done. If the organizations dont feel as though they are in control, or that their problems or concerns are not being addressed properly, this may affect the lineament of law enforcement.It could also cause communication issues and lapses. There is the other possibility, that some people may have the opinion that things are better with more outside control. Policing may have to change in many ways to adapt to the change in control. Conclusion In conclusion I think there can be both pros and cons to the relationship between the U. S. government and the police organizations. I also believe that Sir Robert Peel had a major effect on the policing of his time, our current police procedures, and community policing.