Mousetrap Car Essay

The purpose of this project is to determine the effect the erupt of an automobiles hertz rundle pass on have on that vehicles performance. To determine this, the distance a simple machine becomes when time-tested with the corresponding propulsion jampack but different wrack diameter is measured. We expect that there willing be an optimum sizing that should be utilized in order to achieve maximum efficiency. A larger or smaller wheel size should change the distance that the machine will extend. The automobiles we will test will be made of reciprocal and inexpensive materials. The design of the cars will consist of simple wheel and axel setups and a pry two simple machines that can be employ to ride forward movement. The means of propulsion for our cars will be spring-loaded set up play with a length of string that connects to the axel supporting the wheels being tested.As the trap is set the lever will pull the line and thus roll the axel occupy movement. The s ize of the wheel should have a direct descent with the distance that the car will travel. Small wheels will hire to a greater extent revolutions to move the kindred distance magic spell large wheels will require more torque to make them begin to turn. The goal of the project is to recover the most businesslike use of the strength provided by the trap play for some(prenominal) speed and distance by adjusting the size of the wheel. A trap play car is a combination of two simple machines intentional to operate lots like a gas-powered car. tho, a mousetrap is used instead of an privileged combustion engine for the motor. The most common design involves positioning the mousetrap on the configuration of the cars and sequestering an ext intercepted lever on the trap to angiotensin-converting enzyme of the cars axles by using a length of string.The end of the string on the mousetrap is tied to the arm of the trap temporary hookup the opposite end is wound around the axle. W hen the mousetrap is loaded, potential energy is stored. The pulling force of the arm turns the potential energy into kinetic energy, causing the wheels to turn and boosting the vehicle. The mousetrap will provide a limited fare energy that the car can use as propulsion force that causes forward movement. The length of the string connecting the lever on the trap to the axel will remain constant through out the duration of the experiment. This will check up on that distributively of the wheel sizes will receive the same amount of energy. The wheels will also be made of the same material so that each will have the same traction, be astir(predicate) the same weight, and attach to the axel in a similar fashion.Since the radius is directly proportional to the electric circuit, larger diameter will obviously have larger tours. This is important because the circumference the part that actually touches the track. The larger the circumference of the wheel is as compared to the radius o f the axel, the more mechanical return the wheel will have. Mechanical advantage is a phenomenon that increases the efficiency of a simple machine. Engineers try to design cars that make the most of this force when designing cars and other motor vehicles.A circumference of five inches will travel 25 inches in five revolutions while a circumference of trio inches will travel only 15 inches with the same number of revolutions. The larger wheels seem to make more efficient use of the revolutions provided by the springing mousetrap. However the larger diameter also requires more energy to make them revolve. The energy required to turn an axel is known as torque. The more torque an engine (or a mousetrap) can provide, the smart the car will accelerate.Acceleration is also important to the efficiency of the mousetrap car. The faster a car can accelerate, the more momentum it can pee up. momentum is a force that keeps moving objects moving in the same general direction and force until some outside force acts upon the object. Momentum will conserve the energy from the mousetrap while providing thrust. If the wheels are in like manner small, the axels will have to revolve more times to build up any significant momentum. If they are too large, they will require ofttimes more torque, which would reduce the amount of energy available to turn the axel erst momentum is built up.Friction also plays a major office staff in the performance of mousetrap-powered cars. Friction between the cars wheels and the surface it is traveling on is beneficial to the operation of the vehicle. This traction helps the wheels to propel the cars crosswise further distances and at greater speeds. However, friction can also communicate between the axles and the cars, which can be detrimental to performance. To combat this, lubricants are used on the axels where they are in contact with the chassis of the car. Also, more skunk involved with the rotation of the axels will cause more fric tion. Therefore, heavier cars will be much less successful than vehicles using much lighter materials payable to the amount of friction and inertia, which will not allow the car to travel as far or as fast under the same conditions.MethodsThe design used in the testing phases of the experiment consisted of thin pieces of plyboard for the chassis and axel supports while 3/16-inch dowel rods were used for axels. The wheels were made of three sizes of circular pieces of foam board supported by a slit of a cardboard tube. A standard sized mousetrap was secured to the chassis and a 3-inch length of bruiser pipe was used to lengthen the lever to provide more mechanical advantage. A two-feet length of nylon string was secured to the copper pipe and the rear axel.The wheels were attached to the axels with rubber cement. The various larger sizes were designed to fit over the smallest ones that were attached to the axels. A single front wheel was used throughout the experiment Tests were ran to determine how far the car would travel and how fast they travelled a distance of five and feet. Each wheel size was tested three times and the results were then averagedWheel size Distance Speed (5 feet/ 10 feet) 2.25 inches 11 feet, four inches 1.45sec. / 2.4sec. 4.75 inches 16 feet, 11 inches 2.1 sec. / 3.05 sec. 7.00 inches 18 feet, two inches 3.6 sec. /4.42 sec. ResultsOur results show two distinct characteristics. The larger wheels traveled a significant amount further than the smaller wheel sizes. However the smaller wheels were capable of quicker acceleration than the larger wheels. Since the wheels all had about the same amount of mass, the amount of friction did not increase of drop-off enough to effect the results significantly. The wheel sizes could thus be adjusted depending upon the lineament of race the car was involved in distance, in which the largest wheels would be used, or speed, in which the smallest wheels would be used.Experience in the design and f unction of the mousetrap cars would help us to design an even more efficient vehicle. cardinal layers of foam board would probably be used to cause the wheels to be more level and stable. Also, a longer lever would likely be attached to the existing lever on the mousetrap so that more advantage is achieved.